The
term ‘Education’ is ever evolving concept, devoid of a standard definition. The
term ‘Education’ has given birth to different ideologies at different times
primarily based on the socio, economic and cultural situations. Just as the
human society enlarged and spread its roots to different domains, the term
education became bigger and bigger in its perspectives. There can be no fixed
governing principle for global education than the universal principle ‘Change’.
An educational system that is afraid of ‘Change’ can never effectively cater to
the demands of the society. Hence, the ability of an educational system to be
flexible in terms of accommodating the current needs and changes marks its
health.
When
we talk of an educational system, it is explicit that it is a comprehensive
term comprising all those who plan, pool sources, blueprint, edit, propagate
and execute. However, there are two key entities that stand out in any
discussion on education. They are the teacher and the taught. The entire
purpose, meaning and efficiency of any educational pattern revolve around these
two entities, as they decide the success of an educational method. At this
context, it becomes mandatory that there exists a mutual respect, acceptance,
co-ordination and coalition between these two entities in their attempts to
explore the educational method in its fullness.
It
is here the term “Psychology” plays a vital role. A look at the etymology of
the term ‘psychology’ surprises. The word basically means ‘study of the soul or
the mind’. So when we talk about teacher and student psychology, its
interpretation should necessarily include the need for the teachers to be the
best mind readers. A teacher is expected to have the empathy to step deep in to
the shoes of the students and comprehend in fullness the ways of his mind.
There have been many affluent educational theories that elaborate at length the
role of a model teacher. Theories apart, I believe, the relationship between
the teacher and taught must completely be based on mind and conscience than on
theories and definitions.
The
modern educational trend, especially the student teacher relationship as it
exists today, is a worthwhile point to ponder. Today the violence against
teachers by students and vice versa is all over the dailies. A student’s
attempt to stab his teacher made a sensational coverage for our media a few
years before. We are accustomed to hear of students being corporally
ill-treated by teachers and the teachers being either threatened or dealt with
serious injuries by students. Just as any other sensational news that vanishes
into thin air over a period of time, these too are forgotten when something
more sensational than them pop up.
A
teacher - student violence can be customary at any other part of the world but
not in my country that boasts to have a rich gurukula tradition. I am neither
biased nor an extreme patriot. My concern is the strong twist that our nation
has taken within a few decades in terms of student teacher relationship. There
seems to be ‘rigidity’ in their dealings that necessitates such havocs in their
relationship.
A
stroll down our cultural lane would help us understand the evolving differences
in student teacher psychology. The gurukula system the hallmark of our
educational achievements was necessarily need based. I don’t tend to undermine
its glory and I can never be forgiven if I do. My point here is that in a
scenario wherein knowledge was primarily limited and the sources to access was
relatively scarce, there can be no leeway for the students than to surrender
their will to the teacher for the sake of knowledge. Gurukula was completely a
teacher based educational system, wherein the teacher remained the only source
of knowledge. It was a scenario of absolutism, in which the dependency level on
the teacher was complete. In such context, a teacher could command nothing less
than perfect submissiveness from students and it happened. As for teachers,
they were primarily seen as objects of adoration and reverence. Gurukula, in my
humble opinion, was more of absorption of knowledge than assimilation.
Thanks
to the different invaders, who made a piecemeal of our educational system, the
nation shifted from Gurukula to school education system. It is a major
innovation in our educational scenario. It provided a common venue for the
teachers and students to assemble together in the name of education. The
improvement was not merely in the system but in the psychology as well. Still
the dependence on the teacher was left untouched but the rigidity in their
relationship got eased up. It is the golden period of education, as portrayed
by most of the films. There was a mutual respect for teachers and cordiality in
their relationship. The students looked up to their teachers and admired the
teachers and their role models. The teachers in turn looked upon the students
as the sheep entrusted in their guidance and went out of the way to teach them
the nuances of life. The teacher was alpha and omega of the entire educational
life of a student to the extent of making the proverb ‘As is the teacher so are
the students’ come true. A teacher was generally accepted as a member of
students’ family and was consulted for every major life making decisions. The
relationship was more of a potter and clay. As the result, there was no room
for psychological trauma and tantrum.
Going
by the golden proverb, “Change is the one and only unchangeable particle of the
universe”, educational system underwent a major change at the advent of
technological era. The modern era brought along its own share of troubles with
blessings. The advent of technology decentralized knowledge hubs. Knowledge is
no more limited to certain precincts. Internet deals a death blow to
educational arrogance. Information is just a click away. Anyone and everyone
from anywhere and everywhere can have an easy access to information,
irrespective of their caste, creed and religion. We live in a “Right to
Information Era” that makes knowledge accessible and extremely affordable. In
such context, dependence on one for the sake of information or education is
perfectly meaningless. The modern era does not credit one with the absolute
authority on any field. One can be well informed in a field but can never claim
to be the sole master. In such a scenario of intellectual independence, we need
to surely reframe our norms of teacher student psychology.
An
approach to education with a liaison to the outdated terms of educational
psychology would surely prove to be devastating. In the modern era, teacher is
not a ‘be all and end all’ of education but merely a facilitator of education. The
teacher stands as the doorpost for the students to walk through and explore the
citadels of knowledge. A rigid door has very few visitors and this is true of
teachers too. It is the time for the teaching fraternity to extend their arms
to embrace the student community as they are.
The
major crevice in the psychology between teachers and students happens because
of association or comparison. A teacher attempts to judge a student based on
the educational standards of his/her old era. Just as the old wine cannot be
poured into new wine skins, the trends of the past cannot be the touching
stones to assess the present. The terms ‘good’ and ‘bad’ have relatively
similar or vague meaning in the modern trend. We need to remember that the
anti-heroes attract more crowds in the modern days than the ‘goody goody
heroes’ of the past.
‘Horizon
Enhancement’ is the primary need of the hour. We need to widen our purview in
our understanding of the modern day students community. Remember we deal with a
more mentally turbulent student community than in the past. The sources of
distraction were merely limited to televisions sets in the past. But in modern times,
the distraction points are unlimited. It is uncommon to see a student without
modern day contrivances. A kindergartener knows well the difference between
wifi and mobile data. The computer games harbor on their anxiety and bring out
the alpha in students. Acute materialism places them under heavy stress. They
struggle psychologically with the economic difference that exists between them
and their friends or neighbours. Their dreams are purely either materialistic
or sensuous. They are perplexed over their anatomy and troubled over their
doubts on sexuality. Their queries on religion and caste, when go unanswered, perplex
them. They struggle to get into terms with the extreme diversity that prevails
in every sphere of our social living. Competitiveness leaves them troubled and
a life of ‘survival of the fittest’ exhaust them. They require ‘answers’ for
their queries, a pair of ears to listen to their concerns, a kind heart to
share their anxieties, a good soul to empathize and a genuine brain to acknowledge
their worth.
Can
we the modern day teacher reach to out a student and meet out the above stated
requirements? It isn’t a hard task but it isn’t an easy one either. It
necessarily demands the widening of our psychological spectrum. Our ancestors
are geniuses, when they commented ‘Child is the father of the man’. It is true
that as teachers we need to learn our lessons on student handling from our day
to day life experiences. ‘As is my child so is my student’ – this is the basic
realization that every teacher must accept, assimilate and apply in their
innovations on education. Unconditional love overhauls every discrepancy in
case of our dealings with our children and this should become true of our
dealings with students too.
We
need not look to tread the path of international and nation greats in our
attempt to become a good teacher. We have our role models in the same
institution where we work. It is a fact that in every institution, there will
surely be one or few educators, who will be extremely popular amidst the
student community. It may not be that every one of them is an intellectual
stalwart. They may be popular among students because of their simple ways. They
may be doing ordinary things in an extraordinary way. In my experience as a
student at school and later at college, students do not commonly get bowled
over by teachers’ intellectual prowess but by the TLC (Tender Loving Care) they
showcase in their dealings with the students. No student would be indifferent
on realizing that a teacher cares and he/she is genuinely involved in their
overall growth. Information is in the air, hence they do not depend solely on
us for knowledge but for guidance and counsel, yes they very much do.
In
the modern day guiding a student in the right, socially approved and
economically feasible way is an art in itself. It requires update, update and
relentless update. Once again it is my humble opinion that the seething tension
between teacher student relationship is our inhibition towards update. We
commonly dwell on our past glory, our outdated academic achievements and almost
rotting medals and laurels that we bagged ages before. It is not enough to be
informed of the basics of our field of operation but the need is to be updated
of the current, evolving trends in our field. Are we as trendy as our students
are? This is the primary question to be pondered upon by every teacher
educator.
We
need not have an active account on social websites but do we atleast know their
do’s and don’ts. Are we computer savvy? Do we know to make the best use of
smartphones? Are we aware of the common codes and signs that our students use
in our communication? Are we abreast with their fashion trends and fashion
statements? Do we have a clue of their heroes and super heroes? Have we got a
taste of the emerging trends in mobile and automobile industry? Are we as quick
as our students in information gathering and sharing? Have we befriended their
likes, desires and ambitions? Do we know for sure the current educational
trends? Are we well-informed of the job market? Have we got an ear for recent
updates in our field? Can we give relevant and related input to our students
well beyond the scope of our textbooks? Are we the right point of approach for
career guidance? Do we own a passion for educational innovation? Are we eager
to spearhead an eduvation?
These
are million dollar questions. You and I commonly downgrade the modern
generation in comparison to our generation. If they are fed with the right
dreams and apt motivations, why would they run astray from the main stream? If
we blame the media for demoralizing them, why have we not emerged as a better
source of motivation for the youngsters? If we blame them for being over
sensuous and purely materialistic, why have we failed to engage them in
educational pursuits or help them channelize their untapped sensuousness
towards progress? If we accuse them of lacking in moral, why have we not
assumed the roles of moral boosters?
Don’t
we long to be a perfect package of all mentioned above to our children? Then
why can’t the same be extended to the student community? Let us give rest to
our accusing fingers and come forward to empathize with the student community
and accept them as they are. Let us be thoroughly aware of our new roles as
facilitators and not as mere teachers. The compelling need is to die to our
past, ignorance, rigidity, inhibitions and educational ambivalence and rise as
phoenix towards educative update and innovation. As said by our Mahatma, “Let
us learn to become the change we desire”.
Pushparaj
BT Asst. English
Govt of Tamilnadu